Ovations and Earmarks
Last night's State of the Union address was interesting. Two main things struck me: ovations and earmarks.
First, the ovations. Why all the standing, sitting, and applauding? Seems silly. It makes the political world look so lame. Are they compensating for the lack of excitement in politics — make it seem like a boxing or footbal match? Are they trying to break up the speech into little digestable bits so they don't get bored and fall asleep? And all the petty not-standing/standing or not-applauding/applauding depending on your politics. Is that a political show for the constituants at home? Or are the politicians displaying some personal conviction? On the one hand, it is great we can all come together and express our political views without violence. On the other hand, it's a very silly dance — like the Macarena.
Second, the earmarks. Beyond the obvious items on Bush's agenda (i.e. Iraq War, Economy, Balanced Budget, Environment, Foreign Oil Dependence), it was interesting he mentioned cutting hidden earmarks that slip into spending bills. I have several friends in the DC area who make very good livings as govt sub-contractors. The money the government spends on projects is rediculous, out of control, and often makes little sense. It makes sense to try and reign this in. As an employee of a public company, if I spent money like the government does, I'd be fired in about 3 days. But, as long as someone gets that money, I hope it's my friends. And I'm not sure the politicians, who meet a few times each year to do their funny little dances, are competent enough to get it done.